Consulting authority essay
The two services are related, but they answer different buyer moments. One starts from an unstable app that already exists. The other starts from a development process that needs better boundaries before more build time is spent.
Both paths use the same shared intake form because the first job is to understand the situation clearly. If you are not sure which path fits, the intake selector includes `Not sure / help me choose`.
Use this when an app, prototype, or partially built AI-assisted system already exists and needs diagnosis, stabilization priorities, and a repair-vs-rebuild decision.
Use this when you are planning or actively managing AI-assisted development and need workflow clarity before wasted implementation accumulates.
Shared intake
The services are distinct, but early fit review needs the same basic context: what exists, what is unstable, what workflow is blocked, and what outcome the buyer needs.
The selector on the shared intake form lets a prospect choose `AI App Rescue / Hardening Audit`, `AI Development Acceleration / Workflow Audit`, or `Not sure / help me choose`. That keeps routing simple without implying hidden intake workflows or separate backend behavior.
Related
These links connect the distinction to the current service pages, audit-output explainer, fragility essay, and shared intake.
